So come!

[ More ]
See ya there!
There will be checkpoints throughout Los Angeles tonight, so don’t even try it. Instead take a cab, take the bus, or simply walk.
Usually AAA offers a free towing service on major holidays such as today for those who drive and have one too many, but I can’t find any information on it regarding tonight. As my sister pointed out, however, there is YDriveLA, a pay service in which a sober driver comes to your car on a folding scooter, which he then packs up in your trunk to drive you and your car home. Or – as I’ve once done – if you’re a AAA member, you can try simply calling and asking to be towed home because you feel unfit to drive. Depending on your membership benefits, you are eligible for a certain amount of free tows within a certain mile radius.
And while you’re thinking about that Guiness, take a moment to order your free Queer the Census sticker by clicking here – make sure to get your request in before the March 22nd deadline.
Another campaign is asking to write in your gender identity. Apparently, however, if you check neither of the given choices, it will be chosen for you by the Census Bureau, but! it will be a very loud and clear statement for the inclusion of other options on the form.
This weekend, celebrate gender evolution with BENT’s Like, Drag Me With a Spoon. Sadly, I will not be able to attend this time, but I’ve been before and it is so much fun – so don’t miss out!
I got pink streaks in my hair!
And you can kinda see them in this video. But don’t watch it for that, watch it for information on bone marrow donation and upcoming community-oriented events.
For more information on bone marrow donor registration, click here and for information regarding AIDS Lifecycle, click here.
And for information on this weekend’s events, click on the titles below.
Shake ‘Em Down Thursday
Thursday March 4th
at the Good Nite Bar in North Hollywood
Trans-Genre CD Release Party
Saturday March 6th
at the Palms Bar in West Hollywood
See you there!
Check out this informative video I came across this morning. I know that it certainly clarified some of my own confusion regarding – and I consider myself a fairly well educated person.
As 2009 draws to a close, I am excited for next year’s potential for change, love, and acceptance. I think we can do it!
In the ongoing debate of nature versus nurture, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science neuroscientist Lise Eliot contends that how we diverge into gender conventions is mostly a matter of nurturing. Drawing from a forty-six page bibliography, Eliot states that the notion of innate gender differences is derived from narrow, inadequate studies.
In Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow Into Troublesome Gaps—And What We Can Do About It she refers to an experiment in which the gender of groups of infants was disguised and adults were gauged on how they perceived the babies. Not surprisingly, they treated what they thought were girls differently from the infants they thought were boys. Eliot proposes that as children come to reflect their parents’ expectations, they begin to fulfill the gender prophecy set on them not only by their parents, but by society as well.
I’ve run from one end of the nature versus nurture spectrum to the other, engaging in various discussions regarding, some of them quite heated. My own conclusion is that it is some part nature and mostly nurture. Considering my own upbringing, Barbie dolls, make-up, and boys were all greatly discouraged, and now I find that I tend to interact more comfortably with women who are not as “girly.” And it’s not as simple as playing with trucks or dolls, nurturing can manifest itself a lot more subtly in the expectations and limitations we may subconsciously form for baby girls versus baby boys – mentally, physically, and emotionally.
As Ursula K LeGuin reminds us in The Left Hand of Darkness, the first question we ask of a newborn is if it is a boy or a girl.
In the continuing fun time adventures of Yours Truly, not all things have actually been Fun Times. In fact, there has been some recent sad news that I will address later. But not right now. There is a season for everything – turn, turn, turn.
As you know, I (pretentiously) dislike television, mostly for its passiveness, its general perpetuation of conventions and stereotypes, and the inane commercials that slice it up.
Today I had myself a Target: Women marathon and seeing advertisements reduced to their exploitative, stereotyping strategies was almost intellectually offensive. If that sounds a little pretentious to you, just have a look.
Which makes me think of Britain’s push to ban excessive Photoshopping, or to at least require “media literacy” classes in school. In high school I was fortunate enough to take such a class and obviously, its lessons have left me a much more savvy, informed viewer. And it’s also why I try to avoid the whole mess altogether.
I recently responded to an acquaintance’s “I just don’t agree with the lifestyle” argument for inequality with a challenge to reconsider. This woman had the audacity to tell me that she “respects me” and “not to take offense” because she “won’t apologize for her beliefs” and that her “gay friends” still accept her, so it’s all okay, right?
I feel sorry for anyone who considers the above to be logical arguments or anecdotes. Choosing to ride a bicycle is a “lifestyle,” who I am attracted to is not. Telling someone you “respect” her yet do not believe she deserves equality is anything but respect since it denies one her humanity all together. You think segregation was born out of “respect?” Should I not take offense to blatant inequality? Should I not be offended by racism or sexism? Yes, your “beliefs” are offensive because I am just as human as you are. Shame on her “gay friends” for allowing themselves to be so disrespected because equality is a battle that you won’t win in the streets, it’s one you will win with open discussions.
Mostly, however, it is tremendously disappointing and heartbreaking. And frustrating. These are the weakest and most hurtful arguments for the opposition to gay marriage because they are basically discrimination ignorantly disguised with a veil of placation. I told her I was disappointed and hurt, and left her with a dare to reevaluate her position, and have since cased communication. I try to populate my life with only good, positive people.
Naturally, I was tickled with yet another gem from Current which, like Target: Women, comically exposes stereotypes and fallacies in our media and society.
To lighten the mood around here, I present to you a charming Brazilian PSA urging (Hahah, get it?) people to urinate in the shower to conserve water.
Yours Truly has been practicing water conservation for years!
All right, so maybe advertising isn’t all that bad.
(Real post coming soon, I swear!)
Music: A pop media tribute to the late King of Pop which unconsciously functions both as social commentary and (Pop?) art.
Gender: Off the Beaten Path is an international contemporary art exhibition exploring violence, women, and art, and you can check it out virtually.
Technology: On the heels of the arrival of my new netbook (Which I am using far more frequently than even I expected), is it really any surprise that the desktop PC is on its way out?
Chew your news, swallow it whole, or take a laxative, just remember to take your vitamins and get plenty of rest.
Cycling: Streetsblog Los Angeles summarizes LA City Council’s Transportation Committee meeting concerning cyclists’ issues from earlier this week (Yesterday, in fact!). The outcome? Well….
LGBTQ: The murder of transwoman Lateisha Green finally garners some attention with the alleged perpetrator facing hate crime charges in the upcoming trial.
Sex: Safe sex good! Sexual violence/confusing messages bad! A recent safer sex ad campaign troubles viewers, and with good reason. (NSFW)
All of a sudden, I find myself diving into feminist blogs, reading article after article, sifting through user comments for good insightful debates. Today I visited the gynecologist’s office, which, of course, brought a very specific attention to my gender. And as I waited for the doctor to arrive, the following ran through my head:
“I have never felt completely fulfilled by my gender/sex.”
Ever since I was a child, there has always been some part of me that wants to be male, or at least not entirely female. Even as a child I balked at selecting only one sex in the identification section of standardized tests. My current Facebook profile displays neither sex and I wish I could figure out a way to remove my sex from my MySpace! If you must know exactly how I feel about it, it’s this: I’m just me.
I’ve never been interested in traditionally “female” things. For instance, I wanted to play hockey. My mother could not bare it, so instead she signed me up for figure skating classes. Which I still liked because I’m an athletic person, but really, I had wanted to play hockey!
My mother would say, “Well, if you want to be a boy so badly, then why don’t you cut your hair short!” And of course, I would recant, because I wanted long hair. Similarly, I like my body. I like my breasts, I like my hips, and I really like my vagina (Except for the slight yeast infection I seem to be battling still!). But I would also really like a penis, and the most I have to work with is a sparkly purple strap-on.
I’m aggressive in my romantic pursuits, and the relationship role I feel most comfortable in is provider. I’ve always fantasized about coming home to a househusband. I like it when I am the only woman left on a bike ride. I like it when someone mistakes me for a boy. I feel more comfortable in more “masculine” social settings. I prefer leadership positions. I like paying for my date. And while I am not fond of skirts or dresses, there are few things I find more sexually appealing than a man in a dress.
I despise, denounce, and reject things I deem “girly.”
After diving into these feminist articles, however, I found myself drowning once I realized that some of my thinking is flawed. To categorize behaviors and preferences as “masculine” and “feminine” denies a person his or her humanity. I have fallen prey to the very conventions I loathe. Men and women are people, and by judging certain women for being “too girly” and by viewing “masculine” traits as more desirable, I am only assisting the problem
At the same time, I do just really like the boys’ club!
Traditions and conventions are hard to kick, especially when our media is saturated with them. And maybe some of them exist because there is some pattern of truth to them.
What I really should be worried about is myself, and pursuing the things that make me happy, whether it’s cracking open a beer and watching a skate video or riding my pink road bike around. I am who I am and I like to do certain things. A large portion of those things could be perceived as “masculine,” but really they’re just activities and preferences. A woman is not bad because she is “girly” and goes to get manicures and wears heels and watches Sex and the City. She’s just a person who gets manicures, wears heels, and watches Sex and the City. A man can be into all those things too.
And when I feel like I don’t fit in because I am not enough this or not enough that, I need to remember that everyone else feels exactly the same way.